(no subject)
I don't know, somehow, if my life consisted of living in nursing homes and being fed through a tube, I wouldn't want to live through all that. I don't want to be a vegetable being fed vegetables through a tube.
And it's good to see that the Supreme Court sees that.
There's "Pro-Life", and then there's "Pro-Living". If putting someone to rest who can do nothing but be fed through a tube, then why isn't killing plants considered a homicide? At least the plants contribute to the transmutation of carbon dioxide to oxygen, right?
And it's good to see that the Supreme Court sees that.
There's "Pro-Life", and then there's "Pro-Living". If putting someone to rest who can do nothing but be fed through a tube, then why isn't killing plants considered a homicide? At least the plants contribute to the transmutation of carbon dioxide to oxygen, right?
To paraphrase Leary...
no subject
no subject
Maybe I haven't read up enough on this, but the whole thing struck me as a little juvenile if her parents are claiming that the husband wants to kill his wife so he can marry another woman.
no subject
If a person is being fed through a tube and paralized but their mind is still functioning and they are aware of what is going on, I don't think we should be able to kill them if they don't want to die.
That being said, the fact that the guy wants to take her off life support so he can marry another woman, and wouldn't have had he not been involved with said woman, is probably true. You know us men. lol
no subject