weaktwos: (Default)
[personal profile] weaktwos
So Trent Lott stepped down today.

This event brought me to thinking about whether this is a Freedom of Speech issue. Some Lott supporters are suggesting it is. Mind you, the well educated supporters haven't said anything, yet. I'm a little curious about what the Supreme Court would say about this. I'm thinking the idea of freedom of speech had to do with not jailing you for expressing your views. I don't think it has anything to do with guaranteeing you a job, or a place of prestige. So, Trent was caught saying a very stupid thing, and then he added to it by coming across as silly on BET, and now he's just got to back up and lay low.

I'd like to know who was at that birthday party that wanted to destroy Trent's career. More than a free speech issue, I think it's a bad karma issue.

The Republican Party wants to tell the people that they are not a racist party, they just happen to have a high concentration of white men in government, that's all. At least that's my perception, and I'm searching for data to back that up, but thus far, I'm not looking in the right place.

Well, I need to quit my gabbin' and run some errands...

Date: 2002-12-20 12:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] patricks.livejournal.com
Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences. It just means the government can't jail you or shoot you for expressing your opinion.

No one silenced Trent Lott, or killed him, or threw him in a dungeon. He's still free to say anything he likes about Strom Thurmond or anything else. He just has to face the fact that some people may not like what he has to say, and as a result may not want to listen to him anymore. Same as everyone else.

Profile

weaktwos: (Default)
weaktwos

January 2017

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 03:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios